CDSB's discussion paper explores the issue of organizational boundary setting for non-financial reporting purposes and offers suggested answers to some of the most often debated questions.
Organizational boundary setting equally affects reporting of general sustainability and other non-financial information, as well as specific aspects of social or environmental information. However, some of the proposals are informed by developments in climate change-related reporting, as it is one of the most developed and advanced areas of non-financial reporting.
Following an the introduction, the paper is divided into three sections as follows:
- The general background to organizational boundary setting for non-financial reporting purposes is set out, including:
- What is non-financial reporting?
- Who are the parties involved in organizational boundary setting?
- The language of organizational boundary setting.
- The current state of organizational boundary setting is examined, and examples of the practices that influence it are provided, including:
- The GHG Protocol, the GRI’s G4 guidelines, the IIRC’s International Integrated Reporting Framework, SASB’s Standards, International Financial Reporting Standards, developments in UK and EU law and examples of corporate practice.
- Points for discussion about organizational boundary setting are proposed.
- Proposals include suggested positions designed to prompt discussion on how organizational boundary setting could develop and a number of specific questions for consideration and comment.
- The discussion section is informed by anecdotal and other evidence about some of the challenges faced by specific sectors including the transport, real estate and extractive industries.
- Recent legislative developments in the UK that led to increased focus on boundary setting where financial information, management commentary and non-financial information are included in the same communication
Image source: marianna/flickr